In an interesting entry about open source software adoption, the announcement of the OSFA (Open Source For America) is discussed. So what exactly is the OSFA? The OSFA is a group of organizations who have invested heavily in open source technologies. The reason this group has formed is to promote the use of open source technology in the US federal government. This is simply a fantastic idea and a landmark in open source history. One may ask why a group of organizations is necessary to help a government adopt open source technology. The answer is that open source is relatively new. There aren't many professionals employed by the US government. The organizations that form the OSFA, however, have plenty of expertise in regards to open source. The US government is concerned with running a country, not choosing which software is best suited for the job.
The benefits of using open source technology apply to the government just as they would to any other organization or individual. That is, any government that chooses open source technology over the proprietary alternative gets treated just as though they are a regular user. There isn't any real discrimination in the open source world with who uses what.
The primary motivation for the US government is to cut costs. They savings are obviously in the fact that there aren't any license fees to pay with open source. However, they also gain everything else that comes with open source including generally better software. Additionally, there are hidden cost savings that generally occur on a per deployment basis.
The Canadian government seems to be falling behind in the information technology department. They certainly need to show more interest in advancing their infrastructure which can be achieved through open source. The OSFA serves as a good example of the next step that should be taken.
Showing posts with label government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label government. Show all posts
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Friday, February 20, 2009
Open source too insecure for government use?
Well, according to an infoworld entry, security firms seem to think so. Rather than go through all the odds and ends of comparing the security differences between proprietary software, I propose a simple experiment. Set up two desktops. Install some variant of Linux on one and install some popular proprietary operating system on the other. Perform some simple everyday tasks and see which one gives you more security problems first.
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
Open source and governement.
The BBC has an interesting entry regarding the new US government and the role open source software could potentially play in it.
The article outlines the standard benefits to using open source. What I think will be interesting is if the government will live up to its "open and transparent government" promise. Another aspect of open source technology not usually mentioned is job creation. There are always going to be more open source developers in the world because there is no cost to learning it (aside from a computer and Internet connection). If the government were to adapt open source, they will also need people who understand it.
I also wonder when the Canadian government will gets its' act together and start looking at open source technology.
The article outlines the standard benefits to using open source. What I think will be interesting is if the government will live up to its "open and transparent government" promise. Another aspect of open source technology not usually mentioned is job creation. There are always going to be more open source developers in the world because there is no cost to learning it (aside from a computer and Internet connection). If the government were to adapt open source, they will also need people who understand it.
I also wonder when the Canadian government will gets its' act together and start looking at open source technology.
Labels:
bbc
,
government
,
jobs
,
opensource
,
us
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)